DNA- gods amazing programming

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

http://youtu.be/CBeCxKzYiIA

The discovery of DNA and it's marvelous blueprint of programming to build God's creatures is one of the many proofs that God does indeed exist. It is an insult to our intelligence for a propaganda essayist (claiming to be a scientist) to actually claim DNA was a proof for evolution, no one could possibly be that dumb, as the Bible says - decieved.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

again weather or not this information is true or not i thought it was an interesting view on DNA and worth sharing :yinyang:

 

[Mime454]

Knew there had to be a reason for your metaphysical dislike and misunderstanding of taxonomy.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

Knew there had to be a reason for your metaphysical dislike and misunderstanding of taxonomy.

honestly i think taxonomy is fun and interesting i just really like questioning mainstream science

 

[aNisip]

Thanks for sharing Ax, I agree.... in our AP Bio class we watched animated movies of all the subjects and areas covered in Biology called BioFlix (not claiming God as Creator at all, actually claiming the theory of evolution) it just made sense that someone had His hand in all of this...

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

Thanks for sharing Ax, I agree.... in our AP Bio class we watched animated movies of all the subjects and areas covered in Biology called BioFlix (not claiming God as Creator at all, actually claiming the theory of evolution) it just made sense that someone had His hand in all of this...

personally i dont see any difference in manifesting your own ideas vs god/spirit/source/consciousness manifesting all reality/information/creation just maybe a lower scale

 

[Mime454]

If you guys decide to go into biology, I'm 99.85% (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA111.html) sure that you'll come around to see that Evolution is the best explanation for life's complexity.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

If you guys decide to go into biology, I'm 99.85% (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA111.html) sure that you'll come around to see that Evolution is the best explanation for life's complexity.

im not part of any institution that challenges my rational approach to my own ideas and what information im "allowed" to accept. i accept most of western science just some areas i find necessary to challenge such as chance mutation, and other probabilistic claims, to me that is just showing our ignorance on forces higher than our current comprehension level and technology. i literally see the universe unfolding with an undeniable purpose like it was pre planned.

 

[gripen]

Oh help me lord... :huh:

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

also science and religion are the same institution in the sence they are both extremely dogmatic, science has just gone down a deeper hole and in consequence there claims are getting more and more abstract. maybe we need a more holistic feminine approach on how we attempt to conceive the cosmos

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/einstein/

the Great Albert Einstein seems to share a similar mind set as me if that matters at all

 

[Mime454]

also science and religion are the same institution in the sence they are both extremely dogmatic, science has just gone down a deeper hole and in consequence there claims are getting more and more abstract. maybe we need a more holistic feminine approach on how we attempt to conceive the cosmos

Maybe I'm crazy, but I don't care how 'feminine' an explanation is, whatever that's supposed to mean (should I buy the Big Bang Theory a dress on my next trip out?). I care about how rigorously tested and replicable an idea, or the calculations behind it. If you think that you are more clever or more well versed than cosmologists, biologists or any other -ologist who have devoted their lives to studying these ideas, please, prove them all wrong and collect your Nobel prizes. That's the best thing about science, it accepts dissenting ideas, if they are better explanations that fit more of the facts than the current explanations. Nearly every idea that is taken for fact now was once wildly against the status quo of its day. Science is only dogmatic in that it requires evidence and experimentation for claims, but that's why it isn't religion.

 

[gripen]

Maybe I'm crazy, but I don't care how 'feminine' an explanation is, whatever that's supposed to mean (should I buy the Big Bang Theory a dress on my next trip out?). I care about how rigorously tested and replicable an idea, or the calculations behind it.

If you think that you are more clever or more well versed than cosmologists, biologists or any other -ologist who have devoted their lives to studying these ideas, please, prove them all wrong and collect your Nobel prizes. That's the best thing about science, it accepts dissenting ideas, if they are better explanations that fit more of the facts than the current explanations. Nearly every idea that is taken for fact now was once wildly against the status quo of its day. Science is only dogmatic in that it requires evidence and experimentation for claims, but that's why it isn't religion.

Exactly! If science were based on faith they would call it a religion. If you can prove it time and time again than science will accept it.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

of course you dont really understand what femininity actually means cause male dominance has been shoved down our throats for 1000s of years

accept what you want i just claim theres more out there than what science claims. we are actually on the same side i just take speculation a step further

thank you for you opinion :tt2:

 

[gripen]

of course you dont really understand what femininity actually means cause male dominance has been shoved down our throats for 1000s of years

accept what you want i just claim theres more out there than what science claims. we are actually on the same side i just take speculation a step further

thank you for you opinion :tt2:

I am glad a male is telling me what femininity is. Remember we live in 2013 not 1813.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

I am glad a male is telling me what femininity is. Remember we live in 2013 not 1813.

i never gave a definition i just said every one male or female is ruled by primarily masculinity views find out for your self what you think it means

 

[Mime454]

i never gave a definition i just said every one male or female is ruled by primarily masculinity views find out for your self what you think it means

There is no such thing as a masculine view. There are masculine people, and feminine people.

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

and to be honest most of out mainstream technology is biased of technologies developed in the 1800s everything eles up to now is in black box

 

[AxolotlsAreCoolToo]

There is no such thing as a masculine view. There are masculine people, and feminine people.

the idea to pick things apart and create hierarchy are all masculine qualities thats nonsence to say an induviual is one or the other. all western civilization is primarily masculine views and its because of our history we inherent these things it up to yourself to question these things