That is a thoughtDiapause might not always be necessary and it certainly would not make sense in a situation where the warmer seasons are long enough that an ootheca has to sit for longer than it can without significant losses to experience a change from warmer weather to cooler weather and back. Egg development is affected by the temperature as we have all observed that cooler temperatures mean later hatch dates, so it is more likely that the diapause we see is a result of cold temperatures slowing down development and not a result of a required biological process. Some species with very slow hatch times might simply have evolved a longer egg stage that can be extended further by cold temperatures.
On the other hand, it is also possible that diapause in mantids is not managed solely by the environmental queues the ootheca experiences and that the discrepency in hatch times is also the result of diapause initiated prior to egg-laying by the environmental queues experienced by the egg-laying female. Mantids kept in captivity cannot be a very good indicator of this as we tend to keep them at more optimal food and temperature levels and lighting is just all over the place. It would be interesting to see if there is a difference in the hatch times for oothecae of the same species between ones obtained from captive bred mantids and ones obained from wild mantids near the end of the season.
So lets assume my cali female who was captive her whole life and went to rick at the end of august was exposed to NC climate
Now in CT in august the temps r in the 80s and daylight hours r about 14 hours
I bet they were a bit greater in NC
So basically, i dont think my cali girl had any reason to assume winter was coming
So assuming her ooths r fertile, i may see some nymphs very soon