Facebook is NOT your friend... It's your BIG BROTHER

Mantidforum

Help Support Mantidforum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yeah, this isn't anything new or evil. Do you guys not want to catch criminals? I don't get it. I don't get paranoia about people saving your information when the user is the one putting that stuff out there. If you're that worried about stuff that doesn't matter then you'd better stop using your grocery store saver's card too because they keep track of everything you buy so that they know what to advertise with you and what coupons to send. Oooh! Evil grocery stores..

 
At least banks ask you if you want them to share your info. But...Your only option is to opt out. Why can't it be something I have to sign-up for, and not automatically be included, with everybody else's info to share. They are banking on people to do nothing(opting-in), so they can then sell that information. I actually have to opt-out every year. RIDICULOUS! Not to mention raping the little guy with undue fees. It's a bunch of WHO-HA if you ask me.

 
Yeah, this isn't anything new or evil. Do you guys not want to catch criminals? I don't get it. I don't get paranoia about people saving your information when the user is the one putting that stuff out there. If you're that worried about stuff that doesn't matter then you'd better stop using your grocery store saver's card too because they keep track of everything you buy so that they know what to advertise with you and what coupons to send. Oooh! Evil grocery stores..
Saying you don't mind them collecting your data because you do nothing wrong is like saying you don't mind a creepy peeping tom looking in your windows because you never take your clothes off. :p

peeping-tom.jpg


Law enforcement does use shopping records to find fugitives, but there is nothing really wrong with that. They need the proper paperwork indicating involvement in a crime to get it. And the grocery stores don't $ELL that information.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The second round of funding into Facebook ($US12.7 million) came from venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager James Breyer was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital firm established by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1999. One of the company's key areas of expertise are in "data mining technologies".

Breyer also served on the board of R&D firm BBN Technologies, which was one of those companies responsible for the rise of the internet.

Dr Anita Jones joined the firm, which included Gilman Louie. She had also served on the In-Q-Tel's board, and had been director of Defence Research and Engineering for the US Department of Defence.

She was also an adviser to the Secretary of Defence and overseeing the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.

It was when a journalist lifted the lid on the DARPA's Information Awareness Office that the public began to show concern at its information mining projects.

Wikipedia's IAO page says: "the IAO has the stated mission to gather as much information as possible about everyone, in a centralised location, for easy perusal by the United States government, including (though not limited to) internet activity, credit card purchase histories, airline ticket purchases, car rentals, medical records, educational transcripts, driver's licenses, utility bills, tax returns, and any other available data.".

Not surprisingly, the backlash from civil libertarians led to a Congressional investigation into DARPA's activity, the Information Awareness Office lost its funding.

Now the internet conspiracy theorists are citing Facebook as the IAO's new mask.

Parts of the IAO's technology round-up included 'human network analysis and behaviour model building engines', which Facebook's massive volume of neatly-targeted data gathering allows for.

Facebook's own Terms of use state: "by posting Member Content to any part of the Web site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, reformat, translate, excerpt and distribute such information and content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorpoate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorise sublicenses of the foregoing.

And in its equally interesting privacy policy: "Facebook may also collect information about you from other sources, such as newspapers, blogs, instant messaging services, and other users of the Facebook service through the operation of the service (eg. photo tags) in order to provide you with more useful information and a more personalised experience. By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States."

Is the CIA really providing the impetus and the funding behind the monster growth of this year's biggest dot com success story? Maybe only the men with the nice suits and ear pieces can answer that.

http://www.nzherald....jectid=10456534

This was the actual logo for DARPA's Information Awareness Office until the public got a look at it...

590px-IAO-logo.png


The agency which Poindexter will run is called the Information Awareness Office. You want to know what that is? Think, Big Brother is Watching You. IAO will supply federal officials with "instant" analysis on what is being written on email and said on phones all over the US. Domestic espionage.

You want to test it out? Text-message any American friend, "Bmb OK. Allah gr8".

The IAO is one of two new offshoots of the Pentagon-based Darpa - the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (it's venerable ancestor, Arpa, invented the internet). The other new agency is called the Information Exploitation Office. Its mission is to supply similarly instant analysis about overseas enemy targets. IEO will employ the computerised sensor networks that have proved so successful in Afghanistan. And, from now on, America - with IEO guiding its smart weaponry - will launch sneak attacks. No more Mr Nice Guy.

More:

http://www.guardian....september11.usa

Department of Homeland Security to step up monitoring of Twitter and other social network sites

She said: 'We're still trying to figure out how you use things like Twitter as a source.

'How do you establish trends and how do you then capture that in an intelligence product?'

Wagner said the department is establishing guidelines on gleaning information from sites such as Twitter and Facebook for law enforcement purposes, the Associated Press reports.

More:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056140/Homeland-Security-step-monitoring-Twitter-social-network-sites.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saying you don't mind them collecting your data because you do nothing wrong is like saying you don't mind a creepy peeping tom looking in your windows because you never take your clothes off. :p

peeping-tom.jpg


Law enforcement does use shopping records to find fugitives, but there is nothing really wrong with that. They need the proper paperwork indicating involvement in a crime to get it. And the grocery stores don't $ELL that information.
Hahahaha this is the greatest non-mantid post on the site...ever! That kid will haunt my life

 
Hey Precarious! You look like quite the precocious one hiding behind that tree. When was that taken? Positively, precariously, precocious. :lol:

 
Hey Precarious! You look like quite the precocious one hiding behind that tree. When was that taken? Positively, precariously, precocious. :lol:
Yup, you got me. I've gained a little weight since that photo was taken (only 50 or 60lbs) so I'm not quite so cute anymore. :blush:

And I've given up tom peepery. Now I just spy on bugs. They never call the police on me.

 
From today's news...

Could employers begin asking for Facebook passwords on applications?

For all the good it can do, social networking also has its share of downsides. Putting personal information of any kind on the internet raises plenty of privacy concerns on its own, and handing over your username and password can be like giving away the keys to your very identity. But if you're in the process of seeking new employment, that may be exactly what you'll have to do.

The image below is a snapshot of an application from North Carolina for a clerical position at a police department. One of the required pieces of information is a disclosure of any social networking accounts, along with the username and password to access them.

(See image at URL link)

You don't have to be a security expert to realize that asking for such information is out of the ordinary. Depending on how much detail and private information you choose to post on Facebook, Google+, or MySpace, relinquishing your password would allow your would-be employer to investigate every area of your life. Aside from status updates that may be secured for only friends to view, logging in to your account provides access to private messages, chat logs, and any number of other potentially damaging tidbits.

We've known for a while that companies often scour social networks when considering a new employee, so keeping party photos and scandalous posts out of the public eye is well advised. And while this particular application appears — for now, at least — to be an isolated case of an employer overreaching their bounds, it highlights a growing problem with social network privacy.

Sites like Facebook have become a one-stop-shop to learn anything and everything about a person. For anyone — especially a company or potential employer — to casually request access to that information is as bold as asking for a copy of person's house keys. Would you agree to a full search of your home and worldly possessions in order to land a job? If the answer is no, then you should be just as hesitant to let someone rummage around inside your online identity.

http://news.yahoo.co...-175240701.html

They're already trying to pass legislation to make lying on Facebook a CRIME.

Justice Department seeks to make lying online a crime

If Eric Holder's Justice Department gets its way, it could become illegal to use a fake name on Facebook.




Declan McCullaugh wrote at CNET:




The U.S. Department of Justice is defending computer hacking laws that make it a crime to use a fake name on Facebook or lie about your weight in an online dating profile at a site like Match.com.




In a statement obtained by CNET that's scheduled to be delivered tomorrow, the Justice Department argues that it must be able to prosecute violations of Web sites' often-ignored, always-unintelligible "terms of service" policies.




What would that mean to computer users who frequent places like Match.com, Facebook, or pretty much any web site with terms of use agreements?




It means the federal government can arrest you if the website owner thinks you have violated those terms.




...




McCullaugh adds:

Google says you can't use its services if "you are not of legal age to form a binding contract," which implies that millions of teenagers would be unindicted criminals. Match.com, meanwhile, says you can't lie about your age, criminalizing the profile of anyone not a model of probity.




"I do not see any serious argument why such conduct should be criminal," (GWU law professor Orin) Kerr says.




But authorities say it would help prosecute cyberbullies and others who abuse the Internet.




...




"It basically leaves it up to a website owner to determine what is a crime,"

U.S. District Judge George Wu said in 2009. "And therefore it criminalizes what would be a breach of contract."



...




More:





CNET Report mentioned in the article:

http://cnettv.cnet.c...3-50114933.html

In case you're failing to catch the plot, this is leading to social media being used as a permanent record of your life's activities by which employers, government, and law enforcement will judge you. When it happens, and it will, you will not be given an option to opt out. Everything you have posted will likely be incorporated. You can be sure Zuckerberg, who doesn't believe you have a right to privacy, will be happy to own the main hub of such a money-making machine. Call me crazy if you want, but the clues are all there if you care to look with a critical eye.

 
Also from today's news...

Your Smartphone Is Spying on You

An Android developer recently discovered a clandestine application called Carrier IQ built into most smartphones that doesn't just track your location; it secretly records your keystrokes, and there's nothing you can do about it. Is it time to put on a tinfoil hat? That depends on how you feel about privacy.

The reason for this invasive Android app seems reasonable enough at face value. Even though it's on most Android, BlackBerry and Nokia devices, most users would never know that Carrier IQ is running in the background, and that's sort of the point. Described on the company's website as software to gain "unprecedented insight into their customers' mobile experience," Carrier IQ is ostensibly supposed to help mobile carriers and device manufacturers gather data in order to improve their products.

Tons of applications do this, and you're probably used to those boxes that pops up on your screen and ask if you want to help the company by sending your data back to them. If you're concerned about your privacy, you just tap no and go about your merry computing way. As security-conscious Android developer Trevor Eckhart realized, however, Carrier IQ does not give you this option, and unless you were code-savvy and looking for it, you'd never know it was there. And based on how aggressive the company has been in trying to keep Eckhart quiet about his discovery, it seems like Carrier IQ doesn't want you to know it's there either.

Eckhart first raised a red flag about Carrier IQ about two weeks ago when he started investigating reports that a software update on the HTC EVO 3D included "user behavior logging" code. The code had worried some geek bloggers when it showed up a couple months ago, but HTC and Sprint insisted that it wasn't much different than normal error-logging software and certainly didn't gather granular data like "contents of messages, photos, videos, etc." Eckhart wrote an exhaustive blog post about his startling findings -- CarrierIQ collected lots data, including keystrokes, and there way for the user to opt out "without advanced knowledge" -- and CarrierIQ flipped out. The company sent Eckhart a cease-and-desist letter demanding that he keep his mouth shut and threatening legal action. But after the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) took a look at the case and determined that Eckhart was working within his First Amendment rights, it backed off but still denied that they recorded keystrokes.

This week, Eckhart fired back with a 17-minute long video showing in painstaking detail how much data CarrierIQ collects, effectively undercutting the company's denial. It was even logging contents of text messages! Wired posted the video on Tuesday night and cemented its status "as one of nine reasons to wear a tinfoil hat." The magazine explains how CarrierIQ even undercuts other companies' security measures:

The video shows the software logging Eckhart’s online search of “hello world.” That’s despite Eckhart using the
http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/SIG=11s1h6dol/EXP=1323902858/**http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_SecureHTTPS
http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/SIG=11s1h6dol/EXP=1323902858/**http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Secureversion of Google which is supposed to hide searches from those who would want to spy by intercepting the traffic between a user and Google. … It’s not even clear what privacy policy covers this. Is it Carrier IQ’s, your carrier’s or your phone manufacturer’s? And, perhaps, most important, is sending your communications to Carrier IQ a violation of the federal government’s ban on wiretapping?
...

This brings us to the second approach. Tracking is creepy. In an Orwellian kind of way, it makes people nervous -- especially Americans -- that the government or the corporations or the system is closing in on them and stealing their freedom. Of course, not everybody feels so strongly about privacy, but as long as you can opt out, it's fine. Last week, Sen. Charles Schumer spoke out about a program at some malls in Virginia and Southern California that were anonymously tracking shoppers' movements by tracking their cell phone signals, and the only way to opt was by not going to the mall. Schumer did not approve. "Personal cell phones are just that -- personal," the New York senator said in a statement. "If retailers want to tap into your phone to see what your shopping patterns are, they can ask you for your permission to do so."

The CarrierIQ software is not dissimilar to the shopper tracking program. In fact, it's arguably worse since it follows you everywhere. In the age of social media, everybody is becoming increasingly aware of and often angry about the amount of private data companies are scooping up with or without their consent. This week, the Federal Trade Commission and Facebook came to an agreement that the social network must make all of their new programs opt-in so as not to break the law by violating users' privacy. Even Mark Zuckerberg admitted in a sincere-sounding blog post that his company had "made a bunch of mistakes" on the privacy front in the past. He went on to detail how "offering people control over the information they share online" was a top priority. This is Mark "Privacy is Over" Zuckerberg we're talking about here. With Facebook reportedly building its own mobile phone platform, wouldn't it be super ironic if people started defecting from the Android army and switching to the Facebook phone in the name of privacy?

Your move, Google.

http://news.yahoo.co...-204933867.html

So Zuckerberg is sorry. Please forgive him. I'm sure it will never happen again.

Researcher’s Video Shows Secret Software on Millions of Phones Logging Everything

More info here:

http://www.wired.com...-logging-video/

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Top