China, Bosnia, Egpyt, and Guatamale PYRAMIDS?

Mantidforum

Help Support Mantidforum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
These are very complex issues. Hard to break it down into soundbites without losing the message. I could go on about these subjects all day if I had a reason to. But I have little tolerance for unnecessary bullsh!t and it seems that's the end of the spectrum you're more interested in. I see very little truth on TV.
Haha bullsh!t? How is my end of the "spectrum" bulls!t? Just because I found out about this recently and thought I should share my thoughts on it, It's ********? I don't watch TV as I too see very little truth to what it presents. Don't talk like you know me bro. I'm just speaking the truth and let you guys take it how you take it. Do yourself a favor and WATCH David Wilcocks Ennigma 2012, Be the judge for yourself and learn something new. He talks about Pyramids, Sacred Geometry, The Pineal Gland. Did you also know he claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce? Be the judge for yourself, I'm just here to try to give you guys an open mind.

 
Haha bullsh!t? How is my end of the "spectrum" bulls!t? Just because I found out about this recently and thought I should share my thoughts on it, It's ********? I don't watch TV as I too see very little truth to what it presents. Don't talk like you know me bro. I'm just speaking the truth and let you guys take it how you take it. Do yourself a favor and WATCH David Wilcocks Ennigma 2012, Be the judge for yourself and learn something new. He talks about Pyramids, Sacred Geometry, The Pineal Gland. Did you also know he claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce? Be the judge for yourself, I'm just here to try to give you guys an open mind.
Maybe my words were too harsh. I apologize. The problem is all of this is old news to me. I've been down this road what seems a lifetime ago, so a lot of it is seen for what it is and bullsh!t is the best word to describe it. I appreciate that you are making an effort to find truth. Sincerely, I do. I forget sometimes what a struggle it is with so many offering ridiculous but easy answers to what cannot be reduced to simple one-liners.

I am very familiar with Wilcox's work. He is a good guy with the best intentions. For the most part I only disagree with his beliefs on the alien issue. I'm not willing to get into this on a public forum, but suffice it to say that not all things which are real are LITERALLY real. And not all things lacking physical reality are imaginary. There is a lot of confusion produced by the word "alien". There are bound to be other intelligent physical lifeforms out there but I do not believe we are being visited by them. There are more mysteries to be solved here on earth before we jump to such conclusions.

 
Agreed, With that there are more mysteries to be solved here on earth before we jump to conclusion. So your saying that everything on this earth evolves besides us? I mean if they were so advanced back in the day like you think they were then why didn't they have Cars, Technology, Weapons like we do today if they were so advanced? Why did it take so long for us to get where we are today? Evolution? The ape man don't stop... Not yet at least. With that being said it is a fact that we use our whole brain but we only use it at 10% simultaneously working the whole brain. 10% Isn't that high of a figure last time I checked...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are talking about David Wilcock, right? The guy with a BS in psychology and a "master's equivancy" for working on a hotline? A guy who is an expert on the pineal gland without ever having formally studied physiology and on the pyramids (whole bunches of them I understand) without the confusing distraction of a formal course of study in archeology. Isn't he also a disciple of Dr. Stephen La Berge who got his doctorate in "parapsychophysiology" or, less ambitiously in psychophysiology from Stanford University. This is no mean achievement given that Stanford does not boast a department of psychophyiology, though it does have a lab which offers credit to post docs. I didn't know that he Wilcock also claimed to be Cayce's reincarnation (what a depressing thought!) but it does not surprise me. Perhaps he will write a new book, "The Real Chariots of the Gods." This is probably great fun for those who like their facts soft and squishy, but one might want to think twice before basing one's life philosophy on it.

 
Agreed, With that there are more mysteries to be solved here on earth before we jump to conclusion. So your saying that everything on this earth evolves besides us? I mean if they were so advanced back in the day like you think they were then why didn't they have Cars, Technology, Weapons like we do today if they were so advanced? Why did it take so long for us to get where we are today? Evolution? The ape man don't stop... Not yet at least. With that being said it is a fact that we use our whole brain but we only use it at 10% simultaneously working the whole brain. 10% Isn't that high of a figure last time I checked...
You sure like stating facts that aren't actually facts, unless your standard for what a fact is consists of someone having once stated it whether true or not. The using 10% of our brain thing is a myth.

Not sure where you got that I'm saying humans don't evolve, but from an esoteric perspective we have actually been long devolving. If you go by the Great Year charted by various traditions we've been moving away from a Golden Age and are just now getting to the point in the cycle where we begin to swing back in that direction. So technically, according to those traditions, we have been devolving into chaos, conflict and ignorance for thousands of years. That's the esoteric explanation for why the earliest cultures were the most technically advanced. That's supposed to be why the earliest Egyptian pyramids are so much better than the later period works. And why western cultures basically recycled what eastern cultures had already known for millenia.

I think I've said as much as I want to on these subjects. You've got a lot to learn before we can have a conversation that isn't just me shooting down what you present. It's not a satisfying experience for me.

 
You sure like stating facts that aren't actually facts, unless your standard for what a fact is consists of someone having once stated it whether true or not. The using 10% of our brain thing is a myth.

Not sure where you got that I'm saying humans don't evolve, but from an esoteric perspective we have actually been long devolving. If you go by the Great Year charted by various traditions we've been moving away from a Golden Age and are just now getting to the point in the cycle where we begin to swing back in that direction. So technically, according to those traditions, we have been devolving into chaos, conflict and ignorance for thousands of years. That's the esoteric explanation for why the earliest cultures were the most technically advanced. That's supposed to be why the earliest Egyptian pyramids are so much better than the later period works. And why western cultures basically recycled what eastern cultures had already known for millenia.

I think I've said as much as I want to on these subjects. You've got a lot to learn before we can have a conversation that isn't just me shooting down what you present. It's not a satisfying experience for me.
OK, READ my post again. I NEVER said we only use 10% of our brain. We use our whole brain but we only use it at 10% simultaneously working the whole brain. Meaning we use our whole brain, But we only use 10% of that part in which we are using. So we are devolving and yet we are coming out with new technology, Cars are even built with a stronger steel now that it can be properly mixed in the right portions when made. Maybe your devolving, Not me.

 
Haha shooting me down, please. You think your so smart. You eat some Smarties or something? So I guess Einstein was crazy and the stuff like the Philadelphia Experiment are all fake as well. Haha. I guess subliminal messages are fake as well and the Illuminati. I guess you have to see it to believe it. Think what you wanna think bro. Get off my nutz now. BYE.

 
OK, READ my post again. I NEVER said we only use 10% of our brain. We use our whole brain but we only use it at 10% simultaneously working the whole brain. Meaning we use our whole brain, But we only use 10% of that part in which we are using. So we are devolving and yet we are coming out with new technology, Cars are even built with a stronger steel now that it can be properly mixed in the right portions when made. Maybe your devolving, Not me.
You are equating knowledge of the physical matrix with more universal or spiritual knowledge. If you believe mater is all there is then I guess you're right. But I don't see things that way at all. Besides, the ancients accomplished physical feats of architecture we cannot match even with our sciences.

10% at once or 10% in total, it's still bunk pulled out of someone's butt. Science doesn't even understand how consciousness arises from a physical mind (because it doesn't) or how memory works (because they believe it to be a purely physical/chemical process). The truth is they do not understand how the brain works but they make a lot of assumptions about it that they present as facts until they are proven wrong.

Seriously, man. This is what I'm talking about. You mention Einstein and the Philadelphia Experiment in the same sentence as if they are equally real. One is bunk, the other was a real man. Guess which is which. And just so you know Einstein wasted a good portion of the end of his life trying to disprove the finding of Quantum Mechanics, which had sprung from his own theories. He thought the quantum equations were convenient number trick to overcome the shortcomings in our understanding of the quantum world. Experiments proved otherwise and he refused to accept it. So maybe he was a little nuts. He did kinda have hair like that lunatic you like on Ancient Aliens. :D

82061-big.jpg


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol true on the hair part but Eisenstein was one of the greatest minds. Not to mention Nikola Tesla, Niels Bohr, John Bardeen, and J. Robert Oppenheimer.

10% at once for that portion of the brain... That's why we don't remember everything we read or see, Learn a certain talent or skill within a matter of days and not weeks. I'm pretty sure if we could used more of our brain and do those types of things we would, Right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are talking about David Wilcock, right? The guy with a BS in psychology and a "master's equivancy" for working on a hotline? A guy who is an expert on the pineal gland without ever having formally studied physiology and on the pyramids (whole bunches of them I understand) without the confusing distraction of a formal course of study in archeology. Isn't he also a disciple of Dr. Stephen La Berge who got his doctorate in "parapsychophysiology" or, less ambitiously in psychophysiology from Stanford University. This is no mean achievement given that Stanford does not boast a department of psychophyiology, though it does have a lab which offers credit to post docs. I didn't know that he Wilcock also claimed to be Cayce's reincarnation (what a depressing thought!) but it does not surprise me. Perhaps he will write a new book, "The Real Chariots of the Gods." This is probably great fun for those who like their facts soft and squishy, but one might want to think twice before basing one's life philosophy on it.
David Wilcock is a professional lecturer, filmmaker and researcher of ancient civilizations, consciousness science, and new paradigms of matter and energy. None of which you stated does he make those assumptions. Also he wasn't no disciple, He learned a technique from Dr. Stepeh La Berge. Called "Lucid Dreaming". That's all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Wilcock is a professional lecturer, filmmaker and researcher of ancient civilizations, consciousness science, and new paradigms of matter and energy. None of which you stated does he make that assumption.
Your first sentence appears to be a cut and paste from this site

http://divinecosmos.com/about-david-wilcock

I say "appears", because several sites have the same blurb. Your seond sentence is not written in English, which makes discussion a little difficult, but subject to your correction, I shall paraphrase it as, "He does not make the claims that you say he does." But he does, or at least this website that was obviously written with his input, does. The education stuff is on the same site; read it throough to the end!

As for the pineal gland, there are numerous references to it, c.f. http://www.slapmagazine.com/component/option,com_jfusion/Itemid,4/index.php?topic=54978.0 but nowhere does this young man describe where he studied enough anatomy and physiology to make groundbreaking pronouncements on the pineal gland's function, nor does he cite a formal study of archeology and linguistics that would allow him to authoritatively pronounce on these subjects. You really should learn the basic facts about your heroes! :D

 
Your first sentence appears to be a cut and paste from this site

http://divinecosmos....t-david-wilcock

I say "appears", because several sites have the same blurb. Your seond sentence is not written in English, which makes discussion a little difficult, but subject to your correction, I shall paraphrase it as, "He does not make the claims that you say he does." But he does, or at least this website that was obviously written with his input, does. The education stuff is on the same site; read it through to the end!

As for the pineal gland, there are numerous references to it, c.f. http://www.slapmagaz...p?topic=54978.0 but nowhere does this young man describe where he studied enough anatomy and physiology to make groundbreaking pronouncements on the pineal gland's function, nor does he cite a formal study of archeology and linguistics that would allow him to authoritatively pronounce on these subjects. You really should learn the basic facts about your heroes! :D
Yes I did copy and paste that from a website only to prove that you where wrong. Cause you where wrong. Also my second sentence was English. As·sump·tion-

1 .The act of taking to or upon oneself: assumption of an obligation.

Why would he need credentials about the Pineal gland when what he talks about in his lectures point out a lot of things that are true. He's not even close to being one of my heroes but take it how you want to take it. Well just have to wait and see what happens that day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes I did copy and paste that from a website only to prove that you where wrong. Cause you where wrong. Also my second sentence was English. As·sump·tion-

1 .The act of taking to or upon oneself: assumption of an obligation.
Well, obviouisly you have me rhetorically outclassed. I knew it would have to happen sooner or later.

 
Well, obviouisly you have me rhetorically outclassed. I knew it would have to happen sooner or later.
You have been seriously outclassed on so many levels, even though Stevie doesn't know that "rhetorically" is a real word, posted as much, then went back to edit his reply after he looked it up and saw he was wrong... again!

So to class things back up I'll post this clip as a distraction so you can pirouette and make a graceful escape...

 

Latest posts

Top