That's absurd, both you getting mad and claiming that I'm avoiding your question. Your question is also absurd too, but out of respect, instead of just flat out saying it, I explained why.Give me a @$#% break! You're just avoiding my questions, simply because you cannot answer them. By the Church driving demons out of a person, proves demons exist. No circular reasoning there buddy. If a person gets a demon thrown out of him by religious means, it means that there was either a demon, or that prayer truly does work, not coincedintly, which means that there truly is a God, completly disproving Atheism without using any blasted 'circular reasoning'!This question assumes 2 things:Then please explain how the Church drives out demons from people with success?
1. That demons exist.
2. If demons exist, then these people who were supposedly exorcised were acting crazy because of demons as opposed to psychological disorders, attention, or whatever other non-demonic/non-religious reason.
So in order for me to answer this question, you will have to prove #1, and then #2.
The question is also an example of CIRCULAR REASONING, as I've just detailed above (I did so, because given the reoccurring use of circular logic here, it seems like people don't understand what circular reasoning is).
You wanna know why your question is both absurd and circular?
It's like me asking, "Then please explain how the U.S. drives out aliens from Area 51 with success?" and then saying that that is proof that aliens exist. ABSURD.
The logical response would be to elicit the questions begged...
This question assumes 2 things:
1. That aliens exist.
2. If aliens exist, then Area had aliens driven out as opposed to top secret military planes.
So in order for me to answer this question, you will have to prove #1, and then #2.
You guys want to have a logical debate, then obey the laws of logic.