StevieHification
Well-known member
Was anyone informed on this?
Yes, I got an Email with photographs of the ark. The sender offered to send me a fragment of the ark, "suitable for framing" for $19.37, but postage and handling was $1,595, so i had to pass up the offer. Did you get a fragment?Was anyone informed on this?
Yeah, I was joking. You can't find something that never existed in the first place.@Precarious, Your not mocking me in the beginning of your sentence are you? Cause I didn't find anything on those two, LOL! I also think it's way beyond crazy that all those old allegorical myths turned out to be reality and not parables.
The ark narrative has been extensively studied by adherents of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, as well as other Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic faiths.Christians? Noah was Jewish sir Remember, your old testiment is the Jewish Torah, written long before Christ roamed this earth.
All I'm knocking is taking myth as history. That will lead you in circles and you'll never find truth that way. Not to mention we have no ancient WOODEN artifacts for a reason. Biological materials decay (if they are not fossilized), which is why we are left with only STONE artifacts. That's how archaeologists get away saying ancient cultures didn't have metal tools or pottery! Metal and pottery decay over a much shorter period. Incidentally stone artifacts can only be dated by biological materials found around them, which is not a very sure method considering what I've pointed out above.Knock me if you want but you really think that people back in the day where more worried about living their lives or making these massive monuments?
Agreed, what are you arguing?The ark narrative has been extensively studied by adherents of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, as well as other Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic faiths.
He's pointing out that ALL of the Old Testament is an adoption of the Jewish Torah. Has nothing to do with who's studied or accepted it. It's a Judaic document. Period. Christians adopted it as part of the accepted form of the Bible. Or should I say Emperor Constantine inserted it even though it represents the Old Covenant vs Christ's New Covenant. There is great conflict between the old and new.The ark narrative has been extensively studied by adherents of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, as well as other Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic faiths.
He's pointing out that ALL of the Old Testament is an adoption of the Jewish Torah. Has nothing to do with who's studied or accepted it. It's a Judaic document. Period. Christians adopted it as part of the accepted form of the Bible. Or should I say Emperor Constantine inserted it even though it represents the Old Covenant vs Christ's New Covenant. There is great conflict between the old and new.
Here is a great book worth looking into...
Jehovah Unmasked!
Ok so your telling me that petrified wood does not exist and that carbon dating it fake? Also I know the bible doesn't talk about Gobekli Tepe but that IS a place of worship... 400 miles is also a lot closer to Turkey then anywhere else. Coincidence then right? Everything we know of is just "coincidence" then? Obliviously not if we were wrong about the ancient history people we thought we knew. Again this isn't new news... It just because we're not informed. The Ark supposly found, it made petrified wood. You think it's perfectly good wood? Come on now.... Also if you've ever been to the Museum of Natural Arts down here in New Mexico there are hundreds of WOODEN and METAL artifacts from back in the day... So I don't know where you got that idea from that wood just decays.All I'm knocking is taking myth as history. That will lead you in circles and you'll never find truth that way. Not to mention we have no ancient WOODEN artifacts for a reason. Biological materials decay (if they are not fossilized), which is why we are left with only STONE artifacts. That's how archaeologists get away saying ancient cultures didn't have metal tools or pottery! Metal and pottery decay over a much shorter period. Incidentally stone artifacts can only be dated by biological materials found around them, which is not a very sure method considering what I've pointed out above.
I don't recall the Bible mentioning Noah's stoneworking skills and there is no Judaic iconography at Gobekli Tepe so there is no evidence of a connection between the supposed arc and Gobekli Tepe. Ararat is nearly 400 miles from Gobekli Tepe. That's not exactly close. Besides that, Gobekli Tepe is estimated to be 11,000 years old. According to Biblical scholars the world is only 6,000 years old! Even if you tie the Noah myth back to the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh that only takes us to about 2150 BC!
Stevie, you can't just mix and match without looking more closely at the facts like they do on Ancient Aliens. I mean you can but I will call you out. I'm not trying to make fun of you. I'm just pointing you in the right direction.
Enter your email address to join: