You are diluting the force of yr argument, MantidLord, to a point where it is difficult to see your point, probably because you are being reactive rather than proactive.
Egregious errors like this don't help your case, either. There is no reason that you should know much about prison society, but if you don't, don't make statements like this without careful research.
Still, I continue to enjoy your posts! I can't remember if you are one of those who consider abortion murder. If so, could you reply to my earlier post about suitable punishments for the murderers who carry it out?
Phil, I don't remember saying abortion was murder, so if you would like to do the laborious task of finding the post where I said that, it would be greatly appreciated. In the meantime, I know I've always believed in what I said above, that abortion should not be used as birth control, but those who get an abortion should not be attacked and ridiculed as animals. Humans aren't the ones to judge. Phil, you making a statement about what I should or should not know is rather unlike you. There are many subjects I know about, yet have absolutely no experience or probably should "not" know about. In relation to the prison system, it was a multicultural class I've taken where a whole unit was devoted to the prison society. Also, listening and reading lectures form prison inmates regarding prison life can change ones perspective. Perhaps you should do the same. In other words, this "careful research" has already been done.
Now, if you can't see my point, I'll highlight it for you:
-Humans consider themselves the most advanced, social, and smartest creatures on Earth. However even the "dumbest" organisms on the planet don't go about murdering each other and committing heinous crimes against one another. Is this because we are not the smartest creatures, or is it a result of mankind being too advanced? You decide. I was simply pointing out the flaws of mankind being the most "advanced social animal" as Patrick put it.
-In terms of the sexual acts of animals, I simply stated that in animals it's not always for reproduction. Just how we humans and a few other animals engage in sex for gratification and not always reproduction, animals use sex for other means as well. Mainly, in the case of social animals and homosexual behaviors, that purpose is for strengthening bonds within the group and/or establishing dominance.
-Therefore, because of the differences that exist between human social behavior and animal social behavior, the two should not be compared. People should not look to animals to support or oppose the acts of mankind. Because with animals, it is different, their intentions and goals are different.
-As I stated in my previous post, the ease it is to compare animals to prison societies is due to how primitive those societies are. In prison, inmates basically live like animals so it's fascinating to see more similarities between the too societies. However in real life, modern society, people don't live primitive lifestyles; meaning you can't make the comparison to animals.
Does that help you?
Humans ARE animals. Whatever. You've obviously spent more time in prison than I, so I can't argue anything there.
For a 40 year old, you obviously are immature. Rather than attack my argument, you go ahead and attack me. In a debate, that's called ad hominem. Whatever the case, I'll stoop down to your level in order to answer you. I've never spent time in prison in my life, never been arrested. Never committed a crime. Never had any family in prison. As such, never drank alcohol, never stole, never smoke, never illegally driven a car. Just because I READ BOOKS about various subjects, you want to assume I've experienced those things? Pathetic. Obviously someone as uncultured as you can't relate to other people or other cultures, so it's best that you don't argue anything, because you know your brain can't handle coming back with a valid response. So I accept you stepping out of the "argument".
well according to the bible people are not animals but made in gods image and if thats the case I doubt god would be called a animal and dont believe in we evolved but wont make any arguments because it is a no win situation and not into confrontations and turn the other way if any are forged!
Thank you Massaman, this I believe in. And you're right, no point in arguing. Obviously Patrick is too single minded to understand these views or at least understand that this is what others believe in.
P.S Happy Father Day!